Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40955995›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

FIGO position statement on surrogacy: Ethical considerations.

Rafal Zadykowicz, Katie Watson, Aris Antsaklis, FIGO Committee on Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. FIGO position statement on surrogacy: Ethical considerations.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rafal ZadykowiczDepartment of Obstetrics, Perinatology, Gynaecology and Reproduction, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8612-9926
Katie WatsonDepartments of Medical Education, Medical Social Sciences, and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Aris AntsaklisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, IASO Maternity Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
FIGO Committee on Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surrogacy raises complex social and ethical issues related to autonomy, informed consent, potential exploitation, and the welfare of all parties involved. In this article, FIGO advocates for ethically sound surrogacy practices that prioritize voluntary and informed consent, safeguard the well-being of surrogates, uphold the rights and responsibilities of intended parents, and place the welfare of the child at the center of all decisions. FIGO discourages surrogacy arrangements in which a woman agrees in advance to surrender a child to whom she is genetically related ("traditional surrogacy") and supports surrogacy arrangements in which a woman agrees in advance to surrender a child to whom she is not genetically related ("gestational surrogacy") provided they align with core ethical principles. FIGO also emphasizes the importance of adhering to international ethical standards, particularly in the context of cross-border surrogacy arrangements.

Indexed as

Gestational CarriersFemaleHumansInformed ConsentPersonal AutonomyPregnancyethical aspects and standardsFIGOsurrogacy

Identifiers

PMID40955995
PMCPMC12553094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.