Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40955872›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders

Managing Facial Palsy After Stroke: Results From an Online Survey of Health Professionals.

Havva Sumeyye Eroglu, Audrey Bowen, Matthew Checketts, Claire Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Havva Sumeyye ErogluDivision of Psychology, Communication and Human Neuroscience, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5032-460X
Audrey BowenDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4075-1215
Matthew CheckettsSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5330-8242
Claire MitchellDivision of Psychology, Communication and Human Neuroscience, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2445-8468

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-stroke facial palsy significantly impacts patients' communication, eating and overall quality of life. Despite its prevalence, standardised management guidelines are lacking and evidence for assessment and treatment approaches remains limited.

aimTo describe UK clinical practice for assessing and treating post-stroke facial palsy and which healthcare professionals play a role.

methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted using Qualtrics to collect data on participants' professional lives, assessment and treatment practices. UK healthcare professionals in stroke or facial palsy care were recruited through social media, conferences and professional networks.

resultsNinety-six out of 150 professionals completed the survey, mainly speech and language therapists (40%) and physiotherapists (43%), including 17 others (occupational therapists, nurses, doctors and orthoptists). Speech and language therapists and physiotherapists were the most likely professions involved in the collaborative management of post-stroke facial palsy. The most common assessment was clinical observation (84%). Some assessments were more favoured by certain professions, for example, 71% of nurses and doctors used the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; speech and language therapists and physiotherapists used the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System and clinical observational methods more than the 'Other group'. The most commonly used treatments were orofacial exercises (60%) and facial massage (52%).

conclusionThe study describes current UK practice for managing post-stroke facial palsy and underscores the critical roles of speech and language therapists and physiotherapists. Now that we know what is used and by whom, we should explore the evidence underpinning this practice to guide assessment and treatment and improve outcomes for stroke survivors. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject Post-stroke facial palsy affects 45%-60% of acute stroke patients, significantly impacting physical appearance, communication and quality of life. There are currently no clinical guidelines for managing post-stroke facial palsy, and it is notably absent from national stroke guidelines. Previous international research indicates uncertainty about which professionals should lead facial palsy management after stroke. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This is the first UK-specific survey examining how post-stroke facial palsy is managed across multiple healthcare professions. Speech and language therapists and physiotherapists are identified as the primary providers of post-stroke facial palsy care in the UK. The study reveals significant variations in assessment methods, with most clinicians relying on informal observational approaches rather than standardised tools. Common barriers to implementation include a lack of resources, confidence and clear clinical guidelines. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The findings highlight a need for standardised assessment tools and evidence-based treatment guidelines for post-stroke facial palsy. Healthcare professionals require specific training in facial palsy assessment and management. Future service development should focus on clarifying professional roles and promoting interdisciplinary collaboration in facial palsy care.

Indexed as

Facial ParalysisHealth PersonnelStrokeStroke RehabilitationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansLanguage TherapyMaleMiddle AgedSpeech TherapySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomassessmentfacial palsymultidisciplinary managementstroketreatment

Identifiers

PMID40955872
PMCPMC12439456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.