ArticleJMIR formative research2025
Web-Based Video Platforms as Sources of Information on Body Image Dissatisfaction in Adolescents: Content and Quality Analysis of a Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- A cross-sectional study assessing the reliability and quality of educational videos on hydrocephalus available on TikTok and Bilibili.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of pediatric inguinal hernia treatment information on TikTok and Bilibili.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Short-form video platforms as a source of ankylosing spondylitis information: a cross-sectional content analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Information quality of videos related to adolescent depression on social media platforms: a comparative study of TikTok and BiliBili.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Health information quality of gallbladder cancer videos on TikTok and Bilibili in China: A cross-sectional content analysis.Digital healthArticle
- Evaluating the reliability and quality of osteoporosis content on TikTok and BiliBili: A cross-sectional content analysis.Digital healthArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Body image dissatisfaction among children and adolescents is a significant public health concern and is associated with numerous physical and mental problems. Social media platforms, including TikTok, BiliBili, and YouTube, have become popular sources of health information. However, the quality and reliability of content related to body image dissatisfaction have not been comprehensively evaluated. Objective: The primary goal of this study was to examine the quality and reliability of videos related to body image dissatisfaction on TikTok, BiliBili, and YouTube. Methods: The keywords "body image dissatisfaction" were searched on YouTube, TikTok, and BiliBili in November 2024. Videos were collected based on platform-specific sort filters, including the filter of "Most liked" on TikTok and the filter of "Most viewed" on BiliBili and YouTube. The top 100 videos on each platform were reviewed and screened in the study. After excluding videos that were (1) not in English or Chinese, (2) duplicates, (3) irrelevant, (4) no audio or visual, (5) contained advertisements, and (6) with a Global Quality Scale (GQS) score of 1, the final sample consisted of 64 videos, which formed the basis of our research and subsequent findings. Two reviewers (LL and JNY) screened, selected, extracted data, and evaluated all videos using the GQS, the Modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) scores, and the Modified Journal of the American Medical Association (mJAMA) benchmark criteria. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 28.0; IBM Corp). Results: In total, 64 videos were analyzed in the study, including 20 from TikTok, 13 from BiliBili, and 31 from YouTube. The median duration of the involved videos was 3.01 (IQR 1.00-5.94) minutes on TikTok, 3.52 (IQR 2.36-5.63) minutes on BiliBili, and 4.86 (IQR 3.10-6.93) minutes on YouTube. Compared with the other 2 platforms, BiliBili videos received higher likes and more comments. The majority of the videos (n=40, 62%) were uploaded by self-media. The quality of the videos on YouTube shows the highest overall scores. Videos uploaded by professional authors had significantly higher GQS, mDISCERN, and mJAMA scores compared to those uploaded by nonprofessionals. There was no significant correlation between video quality and the number of views or likes. However, the number of views and likes were significantly positively correlated. Furthermore, a significant correlation was found between the mJAMA, mDISCERN, and GQS scores. Conclusions: Web-based video platforms have become an important source for adolescents to access health information. However, the lack of a significant correlation between video quality and the number of likes and comments poses a challenge for users seeking reliable health information. It is suggested that the quality of the videos on health information would be taken into consideration in the recommendation algorithm on web-based video platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.