Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40955792›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2025

Seeing a sunset: Exploring the joy of vision, in healthy eyes and ocular disease.

Andrew J Anderson, Lauren N Ayton, Eden G Robertson, Bao N Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew J AndersonDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7015-0061
Lauren N AytonDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9907-084X
Eden G RobertsonDiscipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9395-7896
Bao N NguyenDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3097-619X

Funding

Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of MelbourneMedical Research Future Fund Stem Cell Therapies Mission grant APP2016039National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grant GNT#1195713Victorian Optometrists Training and Education Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVision plays a critical role in the performance of various functional tasks, and can also be an inherent source of enjoyment unrelated to a functional task. This study aimed to explore the sources and importance of visual enjoyment and how these might alter with vision loss.

methodsFourteen adults (26-81 years) with self-reported healthy vision and 15 (37-84 years) with vision loss (inherited retinal disease, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration) participated. Across four focus groups (2 × healthy vision, 2 × vision loss), participants were asked about sources of visual enjoyment, attitudes around the distinction between vision to perform tasks versus vision as an inherent source of enjoyment, how sources of visual enjoyment may have changed through eye disease or aging, and experiences with eye care providers regarding visual enjoyment. Transcriptions were analysed using qualitative content analysis.

resultsAlmost all participants felt sources of visual enjoyment were important. Most could think of examples of visual enjoyment as distinct from visual function (e.g., appreciating leaf colour changes, stargazing), with a minority noting sources of enjoyment that either depended upon, or were facilitated by, good vision (e.g., playing golf, reading). Although around half believed the distinction between visual enjoyment and visual function was important, some were unclear whether there was a distinction or saw no distinction. Most felt that aging and vision loss with ocular disease had altered what they considered as sources of visual enjoyment. While direct experience of eye care practitioners considering personal sources of visual enjoyment when providing advice was mostly lacking, many respondents felt visual enjoyment would be important or beneficial to consider.

conclusionsSources of visual enjoyment are important to most people with and without vision loss. These results suggest that some patients may value having their personal sources of visual enjoyment considered by eye care providers.

Indexed as

Eye DiseasesHappinessQuality of LifeVision, OcularVisual AcuityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle Agedocular diseasequalitativevision lossvisual enjoymentvisual functionwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID40955792
PMCPMC12682105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.