Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40955668›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2025

Dissecting the mechanisms of MASLD fibrosis in the era of single-cell and spatial omics.

Fabio Colella, Neil C Henderson, Prakash Ramachandran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Therapeutics for Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fabio ColellaInstitute for Regeneration and Repair, and.
Neil C HendersonInstitute for Regeneration and Repair, and.
Prakash RamachandranInstitute for Regeneration and Repair, and.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), now the most common cause of chronic liver disease, is estimated to affect around 30% of the global population. In MASLD, chronic liver injury can result in scarring or fibrosis, with the degree of fibrosis being the best-known predictor of adverse clinical outcomes. Hence, there is huge interest in developing new therapies to inhibit or reverse fibrosis in MASLD. However, this has been challenging to achieve, as the biology of fibrosis and candidate antifibrotic therapeutic targets have remained poorly described in patient samples. In recent years, the advent of single-cell and spatial omics approaches that can be applied to human samples have started to transform our understanding of fibrosis biology in MASLD. In this Review, we describe these technological advances and discuss the new insights such studies have provided, focusing on the role of epithelial cell plasticity, mesenchymal cell activation, scar-associated macrophage accumulation, and inflammatory cell stimulation as regulators of liver fibrosis. We also consider how omics techniques can enhance our understanding of evolving concepts in the field, such as hot versus cold fibrosis and the mechanisms of liver fibrosis regression. Finally, we touch on future developments and how they are likely to inform a more mechanistic understanding about how fibrosis might differ between patients and how this could influence optimal therapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

Fatty LiverLiver CirrhosisSingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID40955668
PMCPMC12435848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.