ReviewCureus2025
Artificial Intelligence in Neuro-Ophthalmology: Opportunities for the Diagnosis of Optic Neuropathies and Visual Pathway Disorders.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI-assisted diagnosis of neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a systematic review from optic neuritis to papilledema.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- Pituitary and Optic Tract Lesions Masquerading As Glaucoma: Highlighting Diagnostic Challenges.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming the landscape of neuro-ophthalmology by enabling earlier and more precise identification of optic nerve and visual pathway disorders. With the growing complexity of multimodal diagnostic imaging and functional assessments, AI offers a scalable solution to enhance diagnostic accuracy and streamline clinical workflows. Recent advancements, particularly in deep learning (DL) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have shown notable potential in interpreting fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), facilitating the detection of conditions such as optic neuritis (ON), ischemic optic neuropathy, papilledema, and glaucomatous optic nerve damage. In parallel, AI-driven analysis of visual field (VF) tests has demonstrated improved consistency in assessing disease progression, supporting longitudinal monitoring. The development of mobile diagnostic applications and integrated decision-support systems further extends the utility of AI, particularly in settings with limited specialist access. Despite these promising innovations, critical challenges remain. These include data heterogeneity across populations and imaging platforms, the opaque nature of many AI models, which limits clinical interpretability, and the absence of standardized regulatory and ethical guidelines. As the field moves toward broader clinical adoption, success will depend on robust multicenter validation studies, the creation of explainable AI (XAI) frameworks, and the implementation of strong governance structures to ensure safety, fairness, and accountability in patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.