ArticleCureus2025
Bilateral Carotid Artery Dissection Due to Asymmetric Styloid Processes: A Rare Case Report Highlighting the Role of Anatomical Factors Beyond Length.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Styloid Process Elongation as an Incidental Finding in Adult Orthodontic Patients: Prevalence, Morphology and Diagnostic Implications from Panoramic Radiography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elongation of the styloid process (SP) is a recognized etiologic factor in vascular pathologies such as carotid artery dissection (CAD), particularly in Eagle syndrome or stylocarotid artery syndrome. However, CAD involving an SP of normal length is exceedingly rare and often overlooked in clinical evaluations. We present a unique case of bilateral CAD caused by mechanical injury from asymmetric SPs - one elongated and the other of normal length - challenging the conventional belief that only elongated SPs carry clinical importance. A 47-year-old female patient experienced sequential episodes of bilateral CAD over a seven-month period. Radiological evaluations identified bilateral CAD likely attributed to the left SP of normal length (22 mm) and the right SP with elongation (35 mm). Both SPs were located in close proximity (<1 mm) to their respective internal carotid arteries (ICAs). Notably, despite its normal length, the left SP had a steep medial angulation of 65.1°, contributing to the ICA impingement. To restore vascular patency and prevent recurrence, the patient underwent successful bilateral carotid artery stenting followed by transcervical styloidectomies. While elongated SPs are commonly implicated in unilateral vascular symptoms, bilateral CAD related to SP impingement is rare. This case illustrates that even an SP of normal length can cause vascular injury when it exhibits atypical angulation and lies in close proximity to the ICA. Contrary to the conventional belief that only SP elongation has clinical importance, SPs of normal length may play a pathogenic role in SP-related CAD under specific anatomical conditions. We emphasize the importance of a comprehensive radiological evaluation that focuses not solely on SP length when considering potential SP-related vascular pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.