ArticleCureus2025
The Impact of Increased Knee Joint Flexion Angle During Loading Response on Mechanical Load of the Knee Joint in Healthy Elderly Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of Restricted Shoulder Girdle Motion on Knee Joint Kinematics and Kinetics during Walking: Cross-sectional Study.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: According to the well-established correlation between knee joint contact force and external knee adduction moment (KAM) during walking, many studies have focused on gait modifications that target changes in the frontal plane, such as foot progression and trunk inclination angles, to decrease KAM. However, recent research has highlighted the relationship between the external knee flexion moment (KFM) and knee joint contact force, highlighting the importance of considering both the KAM and KFM in gait modifications that highlight changes in the sagittal plane. Consequently, the current study aimed to investigate the effects of increasing knee joint flexion angle while walking on knee joint loading.
methodsThis study was a cross-sectional study. 20 healthy older adults each performed two gait conditions - normal walking and walking with a 10-degree increase in the maximum flexion angle, with five trials conducted for each condition.
resultsThe results showed that increasing the flexion angle significantly reduced KAM. Specifically, the first peak KAM decreased from 0.59 ± 0.24 to 0.43 ± 0.26 N·m/kg·m (p < 0.001), and the second peak KAM from 0.57 ± 0.20 to 0.45 ± 0.25 N·m/kg·m (p = 0.002). Conversely, the peak KFM increased significantly from 1.5 ± 0.48 to 1.8 ± 0.51 N·m/kg·m (p < 0.001). Furthermore, gait modification involved a straightforward intervention-merely providing verbal instructions to slightly increase knee flexion angle-making it both feasible and practical for older adults at higher risk of developing osteoarthritis of the knee (knee OA).
conclusionsEnsuring sufficient knee joint flexion angle during the early stance phase may serve as an effective instructional strategy for reducing KAM. Given its simplicity and non-invasive nature, this intervention may have practical potential for use in clinical or community-based gait training programs for older adults at risk of knee OA. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution when generalized to patients with knee OA. Such individuals may have altered muscle activation, increased joint sensitivity, or limited range of motion, which could affect their response to gait modification. Future studies involving longitudinal follow-up or patient-centered outcomes such as pain, function, and adherence will be necessary to evaluate the long-term clinical applicability of this intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.