Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40955217›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A 62-Year Follow-Up of Vitallium Cup Arthroplasty: A Case Report and Review of Longevity in Historical Context.

Samuel G Orr, Hans Prakash, Karanvir Prakash

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel G OrrOrthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.
Hans PrakashOrthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.
Karanvir PrakashOrthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term outcomes of early hip prostheses remain relevant for understanding implant durability and biological fixation. This report describes a 62-year follow-up of a patient who underwent Vitallium mold arthroplasty of the hip, representing one of the longest known survivals of this implant type. Computed tomography demonstrates apparent biological fixation of the cup to the femoral head, offering a rare view of long-term implant-host integration. The case is analyzed in the context of broader clinical experience and literature trends. Findings from this follow-up raise important considerations regarding prosthesis longevity and the potential for lasting biological function in select implant designs.

Indexed as

biological fixationharris hip scorelong-term follow-up after orthopedic surgeryosseo-integrationvitallium mold hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40955217
PMCPMC12433680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.