ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2025
One-Year Risk of Bleeding in Patients on a Stable Warfarin Dose After Prosthetic Heart Valve Surgery.
Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- One-Year Risk of Bleeding in Patients on a Stable Warfarin Dose After Prosthetic Heart Valve Surgery.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAnticoagulation therapy is required to prevent thromboembolic complications in patients with heart valve surgery (HVS). However, caution must be taken due to the risk of bleeding. This study aimed to identify bleeding risk factors in patients with stable warfarin therapy and develop a predictive tool for high-risk patients.
methodsThis study is a nested case-control design using the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort Data. We identified patients who underwent HVS and were prescribed warfarin within 1 week after the procedure. Of these, patients with the last two identical warfarin prescriptions within 6 months before the bleeding events were defined as the case group, while patients with no bleeding events within 6 months after HVS and two consecutive identical warfarin prescriptions were defined as the control group. Three machine learning models-logistic regression, support vector machine, and random forest-were trained and scored by fivefold validation to validate our feature selection processes. We developed a risk scoring system using adjusted odds ratios from multivariate logistic regression.
resultsOf 1 137 861 subjects, 1093 patients were eligible for the study cohort; 173 and 298 were selected as the case and control groups, respectively. After a series of machine learning processes, eight features were identified as significant risk factors for bleeding events.
conclusionOur finding suggests that furosemide, spironolactone, lacrimal system disorders, ursodeoxycholic acid, captopril, chronic kidney disease, zolpidem, and valsartan are the most important features for predicting bleeding events in patients taking a stable warfarin dose after HVS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.