ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025
GOPAL: A Water Model with Improved Thermodynamic Properties over a Large Pressure and Temperature Range Optimized Using Multistate Reweighting and Configuration Space Mapping.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bayesian Modeling of Polarizable Water: Lessons for Force Field Development.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We show how reweighting and configuration mapping algorithms can be used to efficiently optimize molecular models using thermodynamic properties at a large number of state points from molecular simulations. As a proof of concept, we perform a multidimensional, multiobjective parameterization of a rigid water model over a large pressure [1-5000 atm] and temperature [274.15-372.15 K] range to the experimental property surfaces estimated using the IAPWS95 equation of state for water. Over 4000 parameter combinations in a six-dimensional parameter space were explored during the minimization. A similar parameterization with standard techniques would have taken more than 250 CPU years, but with the application of the newly developed techniques, the computational time was reduced to four CPU months. Without the added efficiency of the methods presented here, the optimization could not have simultaneously taken into account the large range of temperature and pressure points used in the fitting. The paper also describes how and why incorporating the thermodynamic properties from the first and second derivatives of Gibbs energy into the objective function helps improve the parameterization process. The resulting water model reproduces liquid phase density within the upper limit of experimental uncertainty of 0.02% over a large range of temperatures and pressures, the most accurate model yet at this low level of theory over the entire range of temperature and pressure, with little loss of fidelity in other properties. We compare the performance of this water model with 11 other rigid water models in predicting a number of other thermodynamic and kinetic properties. This process illustrates the surprising fact that a simple point charge model is able to accurately capture a substantial range of both temperature- and pressure-dependent thermodynamics without substantial deviation from experiment at ambient temperatures and pressures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.