Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40954538›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2025

Long-term perineal wound healing and re-operation rates after proctectomy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease-A retrospective multicentre study.

John Berghog, Maria Hermanson, Anton Risto, Marcus Bendtsen, Jesper Strömbäck Eklund, David Unger, Hanna Gustafsson, Martin Hagavall, Kalle Landerholm, Pamela Buchwald and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Long-term perineal wound healing and re-operation rates after proctectomy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease-A retrospective multicentre study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

John BerghogDepartment of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9359-305X
Maria HermansonDepartment of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2849-698X
Anton RistoDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linkoping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5687-0473
Marcus BendtsenDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linkoping, Sweden.
Jesper Strömbäck EklundDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
David UngerDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hanna GustafssonDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmo, Sweden.
Martin HagavallDepartment of Surgery, Ryhov County Hospital, Jonkoping, Sweden.
Kalle LanderholmDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linkoping, Sweden.
Pamela BuchwaldDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmo, Sweden.
Caroline NordenvallDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pär MyrelidDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linkoping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7518-9213
SOIBD, the Swedish Organization for the study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPerineal wound complications occur frequently after proctectomy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with persistent perineal wounds appearing in some patients. This study examines the surgical outcomes after proctectomy in patients with IBD in a contemporary setting, with primary perineal wound healing as the primary end-point.

methodsThis is a multicentre retrospective cohort study with five Swedish hospitals participating. Patients with IBD who had undergone proctectomy during the period of 2000-2019 were included. Two exposures of interest were analysed: type of IBD, either ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD), and indication for surgery. Perineal wound healing was assessed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Multilevel binomial regression with complementary log-log link function was used to estimate healing over discrete time intervals, and a separate analysis concerning fistulising disease and healing was conducted.

resultsIn total, 408 patients (57% males, 56% with UC) were included. Refractory proctitis was the most common indication for surgery in both UC (50%) and CD (38%) patients. The 2-year overall healing rate was 91%, with 95% in the UC group and 86% in the CD group. Patients with CD had a significantly slower adjusted healing rate (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.53; 0.85). Anal fistulas as an indication for proctectomy showed significantly lower odds of healing over the entire period compared with proctitis (OR = 0.31, p = 0.036).

conclusionsPerineal wound morbidity with formation of chronic sinuses remains a problem after proctectomy in patients with IBD, primarily in patients with CD and especially those with anal fistulas.

Indexed as

Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesPerineumPostoperative ComplicationsProctectomyReoperationWound HealingAdultAgedColitis, UlcerativeCrohn DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRectal FistulaRetrospective Studiesinflammatory bowel diseaseperineal healingproctectomy

Identifiers

PMID40954538
PMCPMC12436673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.