ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2026
Translational Considerations for Injectable Biomaterials and Bioscaffolds to Repair and Regenerate Brain Tissue.
Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adult neurogenesis can replace lost neurons through migration and participate in the repair of damaged tissues. Neurogenesis by itself is known to be insufficient to replace lost tissue. Injectable bioscaffolds derived from extracellular matrix (ECM) have shown promise in repairing and regenerating brain tissue. These bioscaffolds need to be considered within their pathological context (e.g. proteases), which contribute to its biodegradation. Biodegradation through peripheral immune cells is required to promote the invasion of brain cells and reconstitute a de novo tissue. In addition to the biomaterial characteristics, a greater focus on translational considerations (e.g., intracerebral delivery) is required to establish a robust pathway to the clinic. Especially advances in developing large animal models will be required to address key issues, such as regrowing of a gyrencephalic brain, as well as potential limitations to tissue regeneration due to the size of the volumetric deficits. It is advocated that non-human primates will be an essential step prior to first-in-human investigations. Injectable bioscaffolds have the potential to promote a paradigm shift in the treatment of acute brain injuries, but this can only be achieved through a robust and potentially iterative translational effort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.