ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2025
The Heidelberg Functional Foot Model-Application to Cavovarus and Equinovarus Feet.
Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Heidelberg Functional Foot Model-Application to Cavovarus and Equinovarus Feet.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multisegment foot models have become increasingly important in biomechanical research and clinical gait analysis but often face limitations in defining joint positions. Often, they rely on simplified methods, such as using the midpoint between two markers to represent a joint, which lacks functional verification. In contrast, phenomenological angles, such as the medial arch angle, bypass joint center calculations, and offer sensitive, radiologically aligned indicators of foot mechanics. The Heidelberg functional foot model (HFFM) integrates functionally verified joint positions in combination with clinically relevant phenomenological measures, thereby enhancing clinical interpretability in gait analysis. The marker placement of the HFFM is based on the Heidelberg foot measurement method (HFMM). A four-segment model (shank, hindfoot, forefoot, and hallux) is defined. Anatomical coordinate systems are established via regression formulas derived from functional joint parameter determination. Kinematic angles are compared with radiological measures. Additionally, six clinically relevant angles of the HFMM are integrated into the HFFM. The method is applied to cavovarus (CV, 19 feet), equinovarus (EV, 31 feet), and typically developed feet (TD, 88 feet). EV feet show more pronounced hindfoot varus and forefoot adduction than CV and TD feet. Within the parameters adopted from the HFMM, EV feet exhibit increased subtalar inversion and a stronger medial arch than CV. Significant correlations are identified between hindfoot/shank flexion, forefoot/hindfoot flexion and medial arch, and radiological angles. The HFFM is sensitive for analyzing equinvarus and cavovarus deformities without applying static offsets due to the functional approach. It enables calculating kinetics to better understand the biomechanics of foot deformities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.