SynthesisBasic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology2025
The Effect of ABCB1 Polymorphisms on the Efficacy of Antidepressants.
Synthesis in Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Effect of ABCB1 Polymorphisms on the Efficacy of Antidepressants.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Pooled it
- Precision medicine decision-making under pharmacogenomics in nursing: realizing value from limited evidence to scaled clinical pathways.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review investigates the association between ABCB1 polymorphisms and antidepressant efficacy in humans. A systematic search identified 630 records, of which 58 met the inclusion criteria, resulting in 42 unique studies (five randomised controlled trials (RCTs), two randomised studies (non-RCTs), 30 prospective cohort studies, three case-control studies, one cross-sectional clinical study and one phase I clinical trial). These studies examined single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in or near the ABCB1 gene and their association with antidepressant treatment response. Of the 42 studies, 30 focused on rs1045642, the most extensively studied SNP. Among these, only 20% reported statistically significant associations. Beyond rs1045642, rs2032582 and rs1128503 were also frequently studied, but statistically significant associations were reported in only a minority of cases (28% and 13%, respectively), often with conflicting directions. Haplotype analyses involving all three SNPs (the TTT haplotype) showed mixed results. Results were variable across antidepressants, likely due to overlapping pharmacokinetic pathways. Methodological differences, including study design, sample sizes and definitions of remission, likely contribute to these inconsistencies. This review highlights the complexity of linking ABCB1 polymorphisms to antidepressant treatment response and suggests the need for standardised methodologies and larger, diverse populations in future studies. Haplotype analyses could provide deeper insights and enhance personalised treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.