ArticleBiology direct2025
Single-cell transcriptome analysis suggests cells of the tumor microenvironment as a major discriminator between brain and extracranial melanoma metastases.
Article in Biology direct, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite therapeutic advances, metastatic melanoma, and particularly brain metastasis (MBM), remains a lethal burden for patients. Existing single-cell studies offer a more detailed view of melanoma and its microenvironment, which is crucial to improve diagnosis and treatment.
resultsWe here present a computational reanalysis of single-nucleus data comparing 15 MBM and 10 extracranial melanoma metastases (ECM), considering recent best practice recommendations. We used cell type-specific pseudobulking and omit imputation during patient integration to gain complementary insights. Interestingly, our analysis revealed high homogeneity in tumor cell expression profiles within and between MBM and ECM. However, MBM displayed even higher homogeneity but a more flexible energy metabolism, suggesting a specific metastatic adaptation to the putatively more restricted brain microenvironment. While tumor cells were homogeneous, the metastasis microenvironment, especially lymphocytes and related immune-tumor interaction pathways, exhibited greater divergence between MBM and ECM. Overall, this suggests that major differences between MBM and ECM are potentially driven by variations in their microenvironment. Finally, a comparison of single-cell data to previous bulk studies, including their deconvoluted putative cell types, showed significant differences, potentially causing divergent conclusions.
conclusionOur study contributed to refine the understanding of differences between MBM and ECM, suggesting these are potentially more influenced by their local microenvironments. Future research and therapies could possibly focus on the metabolic flexibility of melanoma brain metastases and patient-specific immune pathway alterations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.