Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40954479›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

Investigation of musculoskeletal complaints affecting the professional or private life of physicians with different exposure times to lead aprons: a cross-sectional study.

Christofer Hartung, Hartmut Görtz, Jörg Heckenkamp, Albert Nienhaus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christofer HartungCompetence Center for Epidemiology and Health Services Research for Healthcare Professionals (CVcare), Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany. c.hartung@uke.de.
Hartmut GörtzGerman Society for Vascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Jörg HeckenkampNiels Stensen Clinics, St Mary's Hospital, Osnabrück, Germany.
Albert NienhausDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Institution for Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services (BGW), Hazardous Substances and Public Health (AGG), 22089, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn medical settings, lead aprons provide protection from ionising radiation but also result in physical strain that may lead to musculoskeletal complaints (MSCs). These complaints may have an impact on the wearer's professional or private life. Therefore, we aimed to assess the 12-month prevalence of MSCs among physicians with different exposure times to lead aprons, and to determine the proportion of MSC-related restrictions in work or leisure time. In addition, we investigated potential confounding factors associated with MSC-related restrictions.

methodsThe study population consisted of physicians working full- or part-time. The data were collected between December 2023 and February 2024 using the German version of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire. The prevalence of MSCs and MSC-related restrictions was recorded in four body regions: neck and cervical spine, thoracic spine, lumbar spine and lower back, as well as the shoulder joints and upper arms. We conducted a multivariate logistic regression (odds ratio; 95% confidence interval) to identify potential occupational and personal confounding factors.

resultsA total of 461 questionnaires were evaluated. Eighty-seven per cent of participants reported regularly wearing a lead apron for at least one year as part of their work. The prevalence of MSCs varied depending on the body region, ranging from 50 to 82%. Between 21% and 44% of the respondents reported MSC-related restrictions at work or in their leisure time. A significant correlation was identified between awkward postures and MSC-related restrictions in all body regions. Lead apron exposure (more than 20 years) increased the likelihood of experiencing MSC-related restrictions in the shoulder joints and upper arms (OR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.036-4.943). Performing more than 100 procedures per year increased the likelihood of experiencing MSC-related restrictions in the thoracic spine (OR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.005-2.670).

conclusionsThis study revealed that MSCs are prevalent among this study population, particularly those affecting the lumbar and cervical spine. Awkward postures at work had a significant impact on MSC-related restrictions in all body regions, whereas wearing a lead apron over several years resulted primarily in MSC-related restrictions affecting the shoulder joints/upper arms. Additional analyses are needed to identify activities that cause physical strain, and determine appropriate, targeted preventive measures.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal DiseasesOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposurePhysiciansProtective ClothingAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansLeadMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsLeadBack painCross-sectional surveyHealth personnelMusculoskeletal diseaseOccupational healthPhysiciansRadiation protectionVascular surgery

Identifiers

PMID40954479
PMCPMC12439371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.