ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2025
Three-layered semantic framework for public health intelligence.
Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Towards precision medicine in Tourette syndrome: a perspective on AI-driven predictive modelling and personalised care.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDisease surveillance systems play a crucial role in monitoring and preventing infectious diseases. However, the current landscape, primarily focused on fragmented health data, poses challenges to contextual understanding and decision-making. This paper addresses this issue by proposing a semantic framework using ontologies to provide a unified data representation for seamless integration. The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach using a case study of a COVID-19 incident at a football game in Italy.
methodIn this study, we undertook a comprehensive approach to gather and analyze data for the development of ontologies within the realm of pandemic intelligence. Multiple ontologies were meticulously crafted to cater to different domains related to pandemic intelligence, such as healthcare systems, mass gatherings, travel, and diseases. The ontologies were classified into top-level, domain, and application layers. This classification facilitated the development of a three-layered architecture, promoting reusability, and consistency in knowledge representation, and serving as the backbone of our semantic framework.
resultThrough the utilization of our semantic framework, we accomplished semantic enrichment of both structured and unstructured data. The integration of data from diverse sources involved mapping to ontology concepts, leading to the creation and storage of RDF triples in the triple store. This process resulted in the construction of linked data, ultimately enhancing the discoverability and accessibility of valuable insights. Furthermore, our anomaly detection algorithm effectively leveraged knowledge graphs extracted from the triple store, employing semantic relationships to discern patterns and anomalies within the data. Notably, this capability was exemplified by the identification of correlations between a football game and a COVID-19 event occurring at the same location and time.
conclusionThe framework showcased its capability to address intricate, multi-domain queries and support diverse levels of detail. Additionally, it demonstrated proficiency in data analysis and visualization, generating graphs that depict patterns and trends; however, challenges related to ontology maintenance, alignment, and mapping must be addressed for the approach's optimal utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.