Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40954472›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2025

Automated brain extraction for canine magnetic resonance images.

Gloria D Lesta, Thomas M Deserno, Samira Abani, Jörg Janisch, Alexej Hänsch, Merlin Laue, Stefanie Winzer, Peter J Dickinson, Steven De Decker, Rodrigo Gutierrez-Quintana and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Gloria D LestaDOS Software-Systeme GmbH, Wolfsburg, Germany.
Thomas M DesernoPeter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics, TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, Braunschweig, Germany.
Samira AbaniDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Jörg JanischDOS Software-Systeme GmbH, Wolfsburg, Germany.
Alexej HänschDOS Software-Systeme GmbH, Wolfsburg, Germany.
Merlin LaueDOS Software-Systeme GmbH, Wolfsburg, Germany.
Stefanie WinzerDOS Software-Systeme GmbH, Wolfsburg, Germany.
Peter J DickinsonDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California, USA.
Steven De DeckerDepartment of Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, London, UK.
Rodrigo Gutierrez-QuintanaSmall Animal Hospital, School of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Aleksandr SubbotinDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Kseniia BocharovaDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Ehren McLartyDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California, USA.
Laura LemkeDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Adriano Wang-LeandroDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Franziska SpohnDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Holger A VolkDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Jasmin N NesslerDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hanover, Germany. jasmin.nessler@tiho-hannover.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrain extraction is a common preprocessing step when working with intracranial medical imaging data. While several tools exist to automate the preprocessing of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the human brain, none are available for canine MRIs. We present a pipeline mapping separate 2D scans to a 3D image, and a neural network for canine brain extraction. METHODOLOGY: The training dataset consisted of T1-weighted and contrast-enhanced images from 68 dogs of different breeds, all cranial conformations (mesaticephalic, dolichocephalic, brachycephalic), with several pathological conditions, taken at three institutions. Testing was performed on a similarly diverse group of 10 dogs with images from a 4th institution.

resultsThe model achieved excellent results in terms of Dice ([Formula: see text]) and Jaccard ([Formula: see text]) metrics and generalised well across different MRI scanners, the three aforementioned skull types, and variations in head size and breed. The pipeline was effective for a combination of one to three acquisition planes (i.e., transversal, dorsal, and sagittal). Aside from the T1 weighted imaging training datasets, the model also performed well on other MRI sequences with Jaccardian indices and median Dice scores ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 and 0.92 to 0.94, respectively.

conclusionsOur approach was robust for automated brain extraction. Variations in canine anatomy and performance degradation in multi-scanner data can largely be mitigated through normalisation and augmentation techniques. Brain extraction, as a preprocessing step, can improve the accuracy of an algorithm for abnormality classification in MRI image slices.

Indexed as

BrainImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAnimalsDogsImaging, Three-DimensionalNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial neural networksBrain extractionBrain tumourMagnetic resonance imagingNeuroimagingSkull stripping

Identifiers

PMID40954472
PMCPMC12439411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.