ArticleBMC health services research2025
Exploring the health system response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Cochabamba, Bolivia: a qualitative study with policymakers and managers.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, health system managers and policymakers were vital in shaping response strategies, allocating resources, and overseeing healthcare delivery. Despite this, limited research has examined their perspectives on the health system response to the crisis, especially in the Latin American context. This study addresses that gap by exploring the health system's response to this pandemic in Cochabamba, Bolivia, through the lens of these key stakeholders.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 10 health system managers and policymakers responsible for the pandemic response. Reflexive thematic analysis guided the development and interpretation of the themes.
resultsOur findings shed light on how the pandemic revealed and intensified pre-existing vulnerabilities within the health system sectors. Political instability and centralized decision-making delayed the response, increased public unrest, and hindered resource mobilization. Fragmented governance structures and inadequate coordination between the public and social security sectors further weakened the health system's capacity. Health services, already strained before the pandemic, faced critical shortages in personnel, equipment, and infrastructure. Stay-at-home regulations, short-term staffing policies, and financial barriers exacerbated staff attrition. However, innovations such as telemedicine and non-conventional healthcare strategies helped mitigate gaps in service delivery.
conclusionsOur findings highlight governance weaknesses, human resource limitations, and structural fragmentation of service delivery, which constrained the Bolivian health system's ability to respond effectively to the pandemic. Addressing these challenges requires strengthening intersectoral coordination and communication, improving workforce sustainability, and investing in better future public health emergency preparation. Improving governance mechanisms, allocating resources equitably, and integrating service delivery could enhance the health system's resilience capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.