Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40954440›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025

Advancing the discourse on neurophobia beyond descriptive epidemiology.

Renato Faria da Gama

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Renato Faria da GamaNutes Institute of Science and Health Education, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro City, Brazil. renatofgama@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7556-1377

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Letter to the Editor addresses the article by Ali et al. on neurophobia among Egyptian medical students. While acknowledging the study's relevance and methodological strengths, the letter highlights a key limitation: the absence of a conceptual framework to explain the deeper pedagogical and epistemological roots of neurophobia. Drawing from a qualitative study conducted in Brazil, the letter suggests that factors such as curricular fragmentation, positivist traditions, and lack of interdisciplinary integration may contribute to neurophobia beyond the commonly cited issues of neuroanatomical complexity and limited clinical exposure. The letter advocates for the inclusion of theory-informed and qualitative perspectives to enrich the understanding of neurophobia and recommends specific pedagogical interventions-such as simulation-based training and creative neuroanatomy teaching tools-as complements to current strategies. It concludes by proposing a more comprehensive and multidimensional approach to tackling neurophobia in medical education.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalNeuroanatomyPhobic DisordersStudents, MedicalEgyptHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.