ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
CT-Based deep learning platform combined with clinical parameters for predicting different discharge outcome in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to enhance the prognostic prediction of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) by comparing the accuracy of three models: a CT-based deep learning model, a clinical variable-based machine learning model, and a hybrid model that integrates both approaches. The goal is to evaluate their performance across different outcome thresholds, including poor outcome (mRS 3-6), loss of independence (mRS 4-6), and severe disability or death (mRS 5-6). MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 1,853 sICH patients from a stroke center database (2008-2021). Patients were divided into two datasets: Dataset A (958 patients) for training/testing the clinical and hybrid models, and Dataset B (895 patients) for training the deep learning model. The imaging model used a 3D ResNet-50 architecture with attention modules, while the clinical model incorporated 19 clinical variables. The hybrid model combined clinical data with prediction probability from the imaging model. Performance metrics were compared using the DeLong test.
resultsThe hybrid model consistently outperformed the other models across all outcome thresholds. For predicting severe disability and death, loss of independence, and poor outcome, the hybrid model achieved accuracies of 82.6%, 79.5%, 80.6% with AUC values of 0.897, 0.871, 0.0873, respectively. GCS scores and imaging model prediction probability were the most significant predictors.
conclusionThe hybrid model, combining CT-based deep learning with clinical variables, offers superior prognostic prediction for sICH outcomes. This integrated approach shows promise for improving clinical decision-making, though further validation in prospective studies is needed.
trial registrationNot applicable because this is a retrospective study, not a clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40954434What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.