ArticleMaternal and child health journal2025
Prevalence of Postpartum Depression in Adolescents in an Urban Teen Clinic.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of postpartum depression (PPD) screening, the prevalence of PPD, and the factors associated with PPD screening amongst adolescents and young adults (AYA) at a free urban teen clinic.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of postpartum visits at a free urban teen health clinic serving AYA ages 13-24. Two trained researchers extracted study data including patient demographics, pregnancy outcomes, time from delivery to first postpartum clinic visit, prenatal mental health diagnoses, and postpartum mental health assessments from charts between 2017 and 2022 with a postpartum visit billing code.
results280 charts were retrieved from which nine were excluded. The majority of subjects identified as White and Hispanic or Latino. Ages ranged from 14 to 24 years and most were 18-24 at the time of the infant's birth. 103 (35.2%) were publicly insured and the remainder were uninsured. 140 (51.7%) of patients received PPD screening with the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Screen or a validated alternative, though the rate of PPD screening significantly improved (p < 0.00001) after clinic flow was changed in 2020. Of those screened (n = 140), the rate of positive scores was 9.9%, lower than expected. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Despite clinical recommendations, only just over half of AYA women had documented mental health screening at the time of postpartum visits. Rates of PPD in this sample were low. As PPD is an adverse childhood event with lifelong implications for the parent and child, efforts to improve PPD screening are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40954403What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.