ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Artificial intelligence-assisted scar visualization under intraoperative bleeding using CycleGAN and uncertainty fusion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Automated Recognition of Hepatocystic Anatomy During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Current Evidence, Clinical Readiness, and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Generative AI-Assisted Indication of Anatomical Landmarks to Enhance Safety under Intraoperative Bleeding in Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026Article
- Sketch recognition model based on improved CycleGAN network and dual attention mechanism.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate intraoperative identification of scar tissue is essential for preventing bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), especially under visually impaired conditions caused by bleeding. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based framework to enhance scar region prediction in such challenging surgical environments.
methodsA hybrid approach was proposed, combining Cycle-Consistent Generative Adversarial Network-based image translation with uncertainty-aware fusion. Bleeding-contaminated laparoscopic images were translated into pseudo non-bleeding representations using unpaired domain adaptation. Segmentation results obtained from the original and translated images were then fused based on pixel-wise entropy to improve robustness.
resultsThe system was evaluated using 99 representative images from 20 surgical patients. Compared with conventional segmentation methods, the proposed framework significantly improved Dice coefficients across all three board-certified endoscopic surgeons who served as expert annotators, with all improvements demonstrating significance (P < 0.001). Subjective evaluations by the same surgeons confirmed high clinical utility, particularly in scar visibility and boundary delineation. The framework achieved near real-time inference speed (0.06 s per frame on an RTX A5000 GPU).
conclusionThis AI-assisted framework improved the accuracy and robustness of scar tissue detection during LC, even in bleeding-compromised fields. Its real-time capability and strong clinical validation indicate substantial potential for intraoperative application and enhancement of surgical safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40954375What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.