ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Fractal Analysis of Mandibular Condyles in Patients with Temporomandibular Disorder.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vücut kitle indeksinin mandibular kemik mimarisi üzerindeki etkileri: retrospektif fraktal boyut ve radyomorfometrik analiz.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fractal analysis (FA) is a mathematical method used to evaluate irregular and complex shapes. The numerical result obtained from FA is called fractal dimension (FD). FA can detect subtle bone changes in diseases that affect bone microstructures such as temporomandibular disorder (TMD), even when these changes are not visible on radiographs. It provides objective results that can improve clinical diagnosis without creating extra burden for patients. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between FD values and both the severity of TMD and degenerative changes in temporomandibular joints (TMJ). Specifically, we aimed to assess the diagnostic capacity of FA for TMD. This study included 161 participants. The presence and severity of TMD in the participants were evaluated using the Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI). Degenerative bone changes in the participants' mandibular condyles were categorized as flattening, osteophytes, and erosion on panoramic radiographic Images. FA was performed using ImageJ 1.49 software on panoramic radiographs. Data were analyzed using independent samples t-test and one-way ANOVA. Post hoc multiple comparisons were evaluated with the least significant difference test (LSD). Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05. The severe TMD group had the lowest mean FD value (1.36 ± 0.11), whereas the group with no TMD (1.48 ± 0.11) had the highest mean FD value. In each case, the mean FD value was found to be statistically significantly lower in participants with flattening, osteophyte, or erosion than in those without (p < 0.001 for each comparison). Our main findings suggest that FD values were significantly associated with both the severity of TMD and with each type of degenerative bone changes we investigated. FA may provide valuable, quantitative information to improve the diagnosis of TMD. As such, FA may support clinicians in making early and accurate diagnoses and treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.