Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40954244›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2025

Haploidentical versus matched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation for adult patients with refractory/relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a study from the Global Committee and the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Yuhua Ru, Jia Chen, Allain-Thibeault Ferhat, Hermann Einsele, Johanna Tischer, Igor-Wolfgang Blau, Emanuele Angelucci, Wolfgang Bethge, Renato Fanin, Robert Zeiser and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yuhua Ru *National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2462-047X
Jia Chen *National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Allain-Thibeault FerhatEBMT Paris Office, Hôpital Saint Antoine APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Hermann EinseleUniversitaetsklinikum Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7680-0819
Johanna TischerKlinikum Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1821-1976
Igor-Wolfgang BlauMedizinische Klinik M. S. Hamatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Berlin, Germany.
Emanuele AngelucciIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6512-6080
Wolfgang BethgeUniversitaet Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6052-2618
Renato FaninAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Udine, Udine, Italy.
Robert ZeiserDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6565-3393
Depei WuNational Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. drwudepei@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6312-3863
Mohamad MohtyEBMT Paris Office, Hôpital Saint Antoine APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7264-808X
Fabio CiceriUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0873-0123
Norbert-Claude GorinEBMT Paris Office, Hôpital Saint Antoine APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France. gorinclaude@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0108-5769

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82200237National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82370215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal alternative donor for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL) patients remains controversial. We retrospectively analyzed adult R/R ALL patients who underwent a first allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) between 2010 and 2022 from either a haploidentical donor (Haplo-HCT) or a 10/10 matched unrelated donor (MUD-HCT). The analysis comprised 249 patients (80 Haplo-HCT and 169 MUD-HCT). For graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, all Haplo-HCT recipients received post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based regimen, whereas all MUD-HCT recipients received anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) only. After propensity score matching, 47 Haplo-HCT and 69 MUD-HCT recipients were enrolled. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of Day 180 grade II-IV aGVHD (34.4% vs. 26.8%; P = 0.27), or 2-year cGVHD (19.2% vs. 13.8%; P = 0.543). However, the incidence of Day 180 grade III-IV aGVHD was significantly higher in the Haplo-HCT group (23.4% vs. 8%; P = 0.048). Two-year overall survival (31.8% vs. 29.2%; P = 0.742), leukemia-free survival (20.4% vs. 24.4%; P = 0.531), relapse incidence (48.1% vs. 53.1%; P = 0.113), or non-relapse mortality (31.5% vs. 22.5%; P = 0.191) were comparable between Haplo-HCT group and MUD-HCT group, respectively. In conclusion, despite a higher incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD, outcomes for R/R ALL patients receiving Haplo-HCT with PTCy were comparable to those receiving 10/10 MUD-HCT with ATG.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaTransplantation ConditioningTransplantation, HaploidenticalUnrelated DonorsAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.