ArticleBone marrow transplantation2025
Haploidentical versus matched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation for adult patients with refractory/relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a study from the Global Committee and the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The optimal alternative donor for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL) patients remains controversial. We retrospectively analyzed adult R/R ALL patients who underwent a first allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) between 2010 and 2022 from either a haploidentical donor (Haplo-HCT) or a 10/10 matched unrelated donor (MUD-HCT). The analysis comprised 249 patients (80 Haplo-HCT and 169 MUD-HCT). For graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, all Haplo-HCT recipients received post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based regimen, whereas all MUD-HCT recipients received anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) only. After propensity score matching, 47 Haplo-HCT and 69 MUD-HCT recipients were enrolled. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of Day 180 grade II-IV aGVHD (34.4% vs. 26.8%; P = 0.27), or 2-year cGVHD (19.2% vs. 13.8%; P = 0.543). However, the incidence of Day 180 grade III-IV aGVHD was significantly higher in the Haplo-HCT group (23.4% vs. 8%; P = 0.048). Two-year overall survival (31.8% vs. 29.2%; P = 0.742), leukemia-free survival (20.4% vs. 24.4%; P = 0.531), relapse incidence (48.1% vs. 53.1%; P = 0.113), or non-relapse mortality (31.5% vs. 22.5%; P = 0.191) were comparable between Haplo-HCT group and MUD-HCT group, respectively. In conclusion, despite a higher incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD, outcomes for R/R ALL patients receiving Haplo-HCT with PTCy were comparable to those receiving 10/10 MUD-HCT with ATG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40954244What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.