Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40954228›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2025

Improving the diagnostic efficiency of forme fruste keratoconus by a new combined model with Fourier parameters and corneal epithelial aberrations.

Rui Ning, Yue Li, Jiawei Li, Xinning Yang, Yizhou Yang, Ingemar Gustafsson, Xingtao Zhou, Xiaoying Wang, Jinhai Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rui Ning *Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University; NHC Key laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Yue Li *Department of Ophthalmology, Yangpu Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Jiawei LiSchool of Ophthalmology and Optometry and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xinning YangUniversity of Shanghai for science and technology, school of health science and engineering, Shanghai, China.
Yizhou YangEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University; NHC Key laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Ingemar GustafssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Ophthalmology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7001-0202
Xingtao ZhouEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University; NHC Key laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoying WangEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University; NHC Key laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China. xiaoyingbbb@163.com.
Jinhai HuangEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University; NHC Key laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China. vip999vip@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-3175

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposesTo explore a new method to improve the diagnostic efficiency of forme fruste keratoconus (FFKC) using the combination of Fourier parameters and corneal epithelial aberrations.

designProspective, case-control analysis.

methodsThis prospective study enrolled 55 FFKC patients and 68 healthy subjects. The same experienced operator performed Casia 2 (Tomey, Nagoya, Japan) and MS-39 (CSO, Florence, Italy) examinations to obtain Fourier parameters and corneal epithelial aberrations within the central 6 mm of the cornea. Independent-samples T tests were applied to compare statistical differences between the two groups. Significant variables were selected through dual logistic regression analysis with a stepwise method. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) were calculated to estimate the diagnostic ability for each parameter and the combined model, and the Youden index was used to determine the cut-off value. Delong test was performed to compare the differences among the AUROC in different conditions.

resultsThe spherical component in Fourier parameters of the posterior surface of the cornea (P = 0.002), the asymmetry of the posterior surface of the cornea (P < 0.001), the higher-order irregularity in Fourier parameters at the posterior surface of the cornea (P = 0.026), and corneal epithelial Z (3, ±1) coma (P = 0.035) were selected as explanatory variables. The combined model demonstrated significantly improved diagnostic efficiency with the highest AUROC value of 0.95 (sensitivity, 0.855; specificity, 0.897; cut-off, 0.400). And the AUROC of the combined model was significantly different from that of the single parameter (P < 0.05).

conclusionThe integration of Fourier parameters and corneal epithelial aberrations holds potential in enhancing the diagnostic efficacy of FFKC, thus serving as a valuable reference for future clinical applications.

Indexed as

Corneal TopographyCorneal Wavefront AberrationEpithelium, CornealFourier AnalysisKeratoconusAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesROC CurveYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40954228
PMCPMC12583819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.