ArticleScientific reports2025
Unraveling cooperative and competitive interactions within protein triplets in the human interactome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowledge of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) is essential for understanding cellular function, yet most network analyses focus on binary interactions. Higher-order motifs such as protein triplets can reveal cooperative or competitive relationships but are difficult to distinguish systematically. We present a computational framework to classify protein triplets in the human protein interaction network (hPIN) as cooperative or competitive. The hPIN was embedded in hyperbolic space using the LaBNE + HM algorithm, and a Random Forest classifier was trained on structurally validated triplets from Interactome3D, achieving high accuracy (AUC = 0.88). Angular and hyperbolic distances were key predictive features. Predicted cooperative triplets were enriched in paralogous partners, indicating that paralogs often bind together to a shared protein using non-overlapping surfaces. The model proved to be effective when tested on a new dataset. AlphaFold 3 modeling supported these predictions, showing that cooperative partners bind at distinct sites, while competitive ones overlap. Our results demonstrate the value of hyperbolic geometry for capturing functional organization in protein complexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.