ArticleScientific reports2025
Advanced real-time detection of acute ischemic stroke using YOLOv12, YOLOv11, and YOLO-NAS: a comparative study for multi-class classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A lightweight improved YOLOv11 framework for intracranial hemorrhage detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrating simplified Swin-T with modified EFS-Net for attention-guided underwater pipelines segmentation in complex underwater environments.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide, demanding diagnostic tools that are both accurate and fast for timely intervention. This study presents a comparative evaluation of three state-of-the-art object detection models-YOLOv12, YOLOv11, and YOLO-NAS-for multi-class AIS detection in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The dataset, comprising four categories (Normal, PD-Patient, Acute Ischemic Stroke, and Control), was preprocessed with normalization, resizing, and augmentation, then split into training (70%), validation (20%), and testing (10%). Models were trained and evaluated on identical data, with performance measured by precision, recall, mean average precision at IoU 0.5 (mAP@50), and inference speed. YOLOv11 achieved the highest mAP@50 (98.5%) and balanced precision (95.4%) and recall (96.6%), making it the most reliable across classes. YOLOv12 performed comparably (mAP@50 98.3%, precision 95.2%, recall 96.0%) with slightly slower inference, while YOLO-NAS offered the fastest speed (154 FPS) but lower precision (76.3%. Results highlight the trade-offs between detection accuracy and processing speed, providing guidance for selecting YOLO-based architectures suited to specific clinical workflows such as emergency stroke care. The real-time implementation, accessible via Roboflow, demonstrates the feasibility of deploying these models for rapid, automated AIS detection in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.