ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced value of chest computed tomography radiomics features in breast density classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the correlation between chest computed tomography (CT) radiomics features and breast density classification, and aiming to develop an automated radiomics model for breast density assessment using chest CT images. The diagnostic performance was evaluated to establish a CT-based alternative for breast density classification in clinical practice. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent both mammography and chest CT scans. The breast density classification results based on mammography images were used to guide the development of CT-based breast density classification models. Radiomic features were extracted from breast regions of interest (ROIs) segmented on chest CT images. The diagnostic performance was evaluated to establish a CT-based alternative for breast density classification in clinical practice. Following dimensionality reduction and selection of dominant radiomic features, four four-class classification models were established, including ① Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), ② One Vs Rest Classifier-Logistic Regression, ③ Gradient Boosting, and ④ Random Forest Classifier. The performance of these models in classifying breast density using CT images was then evaluated. A total of 330 patients, aged 23-79 years, were included for analysis. The breast ROIs were automatically segmented using a U-net neural network model and subsequently refined and calibrated manually. A total of 1427 radiomic features were extracted, and after dimensionality reduction and feature selection, 28 dominant features closely associated with breast density classification were obtained to construct four classification models. Among the tested models-XGBoost, One-vs-Rest Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting Classifier, and Random Forest Classifier-the XGBoost model achieved the best performance, with a classification accuracy of 86.6%. Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curves showed Area Under the Curve (AUC) values of 1.00, 0.93, 0.93, and 0.99 for the four breast density categories, along with a micro-averaged AUC of 0.97 and a macro-averaged AUC of 0.96. Chest CT scans, combined with imaging radiomics models, can accurately classify breast density, providing valuable information related to breast cancer risk stratification. The proposed classification model offers a promising tool for automated breast density assessment, which could enhance personalized breast cancer screening and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.