ArticleBMJ open2025
Seeing Isn't measuring: ICU staff's ability to estimate patient height and weight - A cross-sectional study from Pakistan's largest cardiac centre.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn critical care, intensive care unit (ICU) staff and physicians often estimate patients' height and weight visually, impacting calculations for cardiac function, ventilation, medication, nutrition and renal function. However, accurate assessment is challenging in critically ill patients. This study evaluates the accuracy of visual estimations by ICU staff.
designDescriptive cross-sectional study.
settingNational Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Karachi, Pakistan.
participantsWe included a convenient sample of adult (≥18 years) cardiac patients admitted to the critical care unit in this study. Patients who refused to give consent, trauma/surgery of lower limbs or patients with below-knee or above-knee amputation were excluded to avoid bias. OUTCOME MEASURE: A convenient sample of cardiac ICU patients was included. Measured weight (kg) and height (cm) were compared with visual estimations by senior ICU nurse, senior non-ICU nurse, ICU consultants, fellows and residents. Correlation and agreement were analysed using Bland-Altman plots and 95% agreement limits.
resultsA total of 356 patients were evaluated, of whom 204 (57.3%) were male, with a mean age of 55.2 ± 14.3 years. The median SOFA score was 3 [2-5], and 101 patients (28.4%) were on mechanical ventilation. The mean difference between measured and estimated weight by senior non-ICU nurse was 4.7±9.2 [-13.38-22.83] kg, senior ICU nurse was 7.8±9.9 [-11.56-27.12] kg, ICU consultants was 3.0±6.6 [-9.89-15.79] kg, ICU fellow was 3.0±7.1 [-10.88-16.92] kg and ICU resident was 8.0±9.6 [-10.83-26.79] kg. Similarly, the mean difference between measured and estimated height by senior non-ICU nurse was 2.0±7.3 [-12.36-16.34] cm, senior ICU nurse was 2.4±7.5 [-12.19-17.00] cm, ICU consultants was 1.5±5.6 [-9.51-12.48] cm, ICU fellow was 1.1±5.5 [-9.68-11.95] cm and ICU resident was 2.3±8.5 [-14.40-19.01] cm.
conclusionThe findings indicate that healthcare professionals tend to overestimate both weight and height. The accuracy of these estimations varied among professional groups, underscoring the potential clinical consequences of such errors. This emphasises the need for objective measurements in clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.