ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025
Next-generation multiplex-edited CAR-NK cells: more edits, more power?
Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Come together: The BE-TILs-Efficient multiplex base editing of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Article
- Enhancing CAR-NK persistence to unlock its full therapeutic potentials.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- A new era of natural killer cell immunotherapy in tumor treatment: latest advances and cutting-edge perspectives from basic research to clinical practice.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Engineering with care: safety assessment platforms for CRISPR-modified natural killer cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
First clinical trials demonstrated the safety of adoptive cell transfer with allogeneic natural killer (NK) cell products from healthy donors, making them an attractive candidate for 'off-the-shelf' chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-immune cell therapy. However, reduced persistence and inactivation of NK cells by immunosuppressive cues likely limit the performance of CAR-redirected NK cells. Wang and colleagues demonstrate that multiplex CRISPR base editing allows optimization of the intrinsic functionality of CAR-NK cells improving their therapeutic potential. In contrast to conventional CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editing avoided most double-stranded DNA breaks while enabling highly efficient editing at up to six sites simultaneously. The study further demonstrates the feasibility of a non-viral approach to integrate CAR transgene and multiplex base editing of several immune checkpoints in NK cells using a single electroporation. CAR-NK cells harboring up to three base edits demonstrate improved potency over unedited counterparts in vitro. Xenograft mouse models confirmed increased potency, but also indicated signs of organ toxicity - a phenomenon that will require future studies prior to clinical translation. The study demonstrates that CRISPR base editing is a powerful tool to unleash the full cytotoxic potential of NK cells, but it also warrants the question: How many internal breaks can be removed without hurting CAR-NK cell therapy's impeccable safety record?
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.