Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40954078›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025

Next-generation multiplex-edited CAR-NK cells: more edits, more power?

Tobias Bexte, Dimitrios L Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tobias BexteDepartment of Pediatrics, Experimental Immunology and Celltherapy, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany bexte@med.uni-frankfurt.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2392-6416
Dimitrios L WagnerBerlin Center for Advanced Therapies, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, BE, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2189-3579

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

First clinical trials demonstrated the safety of adoptive cell transfer with allogeneic natural killer (NK) cell products from healthy donors, making them an attractive candidate for 'off-the-shelf' chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-immune cell therapy. However, reduced persistence and inactivation of NK cells by immunosuppressive cues likely limit the performance of CAR-redirected NK cells. Wang and colleagues demonstrate that multiplex CRISPR base editing allows optimization of the intrinsic functionality of CAR-NK cells improving their therapeutic potential. In contrast to conventional CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editing avoided most double-stranded DNA breaks while enabling highly efficient editing at up to six sites simultaneously. The study further demonstrates the feasibility of a non-viral approach to integrate CAR transgene and multiplex base editing of several immune checkpoints in NK cells using a single electroporation. CAR-NK cells harboring up to three base edits demonstrate improved potency over unedited counterparts in vitro. Xenograft mouse models confirmed increased potency, but also indicated signs of organ toxicity - a phenomenon that will require future studies prior to clinical translation. The study demonstrates that CRISPR base editing is a powerful tool to unleash the full cytotoxic potential of NK cells, but it also warrants the question: How many internal breaks can be removed without hurting CAR-NK cell therapy's impeccable safety record?

Indexed as

Gene EditingImmunotherapy, AdoptiveKiller Cells, NaturalReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsHumansMiceReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAdoptive cell therapy - ACTChimeric antigen receptor - CARImmune Checkpoint InhibitorImmunotherapyNatural killer - NK

Identifiers

PMID40954078
PMCPMC12439146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.