ArticleBMJ global health2025
Co-creating community engagement and involvement strategies: understanding challenges and needs of people living with multiple long-term conditions and stakeholders' perspectives in India and Nepal.
Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges faced and lessons learnt while trying to review CHD care in India from parents' perspective.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Integrating meaningful involvement of people living with non-communicable diseases in India's National NCD Programme: lessons learnt and opportunities for global, regional and national contextualisation and adoption.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Community-Based Preventive Health Interventions and Their Impact on Population Health Outcomes: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- "The satisfaction we get by doing this, you do not get it with any money": Experiences, and motivations of, and strategies used by community volunteers delivering social or health interventions in India.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Living with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) presents significant healthcare and patient-level challenges, which are further compounded by fragmented and poorly coordinated healthcare systems, leading to difficulties in access, dissatisfaction with quality of services, non-engagement with treatment protocols and poor outcomes. Overcoming these barriers requires a strong and equitable primary healthcare system that prioritises people-centred care and fosters meaningful community engagement. We aimed to understand how individuals with MLTCs navigate healthcare systems and co-create strategies to support community engagement.10 community conversations (n=90 respondents) were held in New Delhi, Jodhpur, Visakhapatnam (India), Duwakot and Bhaktapur (Nepal) between October-November 2021. These structured discussions explored experiences, beliefs, needs and perceptions of people living with MLTCs, caregivers and healthcare providers. Participants included adults aged 30-75 years, with an equal distribution of men and women. Respondents living with MLTCs reported conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory diseases and mental health conditions. Using a six-step inductive thematic analysis, we examined access, availability, affordability of healthcare services, continuity of care, expectations of health system interventions-electronic decision support system, assisted telemedicine, patient-facing services and community engagement and involvement (CEI).Six key themes emerged: (1) definition of community; (2) disease labelling, identity, social stigma, discrimination and coping mechanisms among people living with MLTCs; (3) access, availability and affordability of medications and healthcare services and associated challenges in receiving care; (4) role of local leaders, decision makers and healthcare professionals; (5) uptake, acceptability and building capacity on use of digital interventions such as telemedicine for healthcare service delivery; (6) community engagement methods, including the need for creation of community champions and innovative approaches to improve healthcare service delivery.The findings highlight significant barriers to accessing care yet also demonstrate the community's readiness to embrace digital tools, especially when guided and supported by trusted local leaders. These insights have key implications for health policy and programme design. Meaningfully engaging people with lived experiences as community champions can improve trust, screening, early diagnosis and self-management, while also bridging gaps between communities and health systems. Digital health interventions such as telemedicine should be embedded within primary care systems through culturally resonant and locally tailored approaches that build digital literacy and foster acceptance. Co-created CEI strategies can help design more equitable, people-centred and scalable health interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.