Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40953938›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2025

Exploring the lived experiences of early- and mid-career female academic GPs in the UK: a biographical narrative interview study.

Ellen MacIver, Pavel Ovseiko, Eleanor Barry, Trisha Greenhalgh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ellen MacIverNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK ellen.maciver@phc.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2483-9858
Pavel OvseikoRadcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3504-2177
Eleanor BarryNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1655-6516
Trisha GreenhalghNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2369-8088

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen are underrepresented within academic general practice, particularly after mid-career.

aimTo explore the lived experiences of early- and mid-career female academic GPs and inform ways to reduce attrition through the GP academic career path. DESIGN AND

settingThis was an in-depth qualitative interview study within the UK.

methodAdapted biographical narrative interpretive method interviews were utilised, analysed thematically using Braun and Clarke's reflexive method, and informed by Bourdieu's theory of practice. Composite narratives were developed as part of the analysis to identify key biographical storylines and to present findings.

resultsIn total, 39 interviews with a diverse sample of 13 female academic GPs were conducted. Five composite narratives reflecting corresponding themes were generated. Participants described: challenges in 'thriving? or surviving?' in academic general practice; 'feeling on the cliff edge' with precarious careers balanced against fulfilment and creativity; the cumulative burdens of 'doing the juggle'; and living between 'two worlds'. Women who followed conventional academic career pathways appeared more positive within their careers than those who did not. Women who entered later in their GP careers and those who experienced multiple forms of disadvantage reported additional barriers. Participants described their efforts managing practical and ethical tensions between their clinical, academic, and personal responsibilities.

conclusionWomen academic GPs live complex and demanding lives. Different strands of their unfolding life narratives - as clinicians, academics, and partners and/or carers - generate recurrent tensions and conflicting pressures. Experiences are varied. Academic support structures should address (among other things) the career-limiting impact of short-term contracts, mentorship, and inequity in navigating the field.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersPhysicians, WomenAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCareer MobilityFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicJob SatisfactionMiddle AgedNarrationQualitative ResearchUnited Kingdomacademiageneral practicequalitative researchwomen

Identifiers

PMID40953938
PMCPMC12770836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.