ArticleStatistics in medicine2025
Collapsible Kernel Machine Regression for Exposomic Analyses.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The diabetes exposome: interplay of environmental and genetic determinants in diabetes.Human genomics · 2026Review
- Collapsible Kernel Machine Regression for Exposomic Analyses.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An important goal of environmental epidemiology is to quantify the complex health effects posed by a wide array of environmental exposures. In studies of a small number of exposures, flexible models like Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) are appealing because they allow for non-linear and non-additive associations among exposures. However, this flexibility comes at the cost of low power and difficult interpretation, particularly in exposomic analyses when the number of exposures is large. We propose a flexible framework that allows for the separate selection of additive and non-additive effects, unifying additive models and kernel machine regression. The proposed approach yields increased power and simpler interpretation when there is little evidence of interaction. Further, it allows users to specify separate priors for additive and non-additive effect s, and allows for statistical inference on non-additive interactions. We extend the approach to a class of multiple index models, in which the special case of kernel machine-distributed lag models is nested. We apply the method to motivating data from a subcohort of the Human Early Life Exposome (HELIX) study containing 65 mixture components grouped into 13 distinct exposure classes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.