ArticleStroke and vascular neurology2026
BEST-BAO: a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial of endovascular treatment with or without intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke due to basilar artery occlusion - study protocol and rationale.
Article in Stroke and vascular neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05631847 (Endovascular Treatment With Or Without Intravenous Alteplase In Acute Ischemic Stroke Of Basilar Artery Occlusion), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Endovascular Treatment With Or Without Intravenous Alteplase In Acute Ischemic Stroke Of Basilar Artery Occlusion: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial (BEST-BAO)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndovascular treatment (EVT) is safe and effective in treating acute ischaemic stroke due to basilar artery occlusion (AIS-BAO); nonetheless, the impact of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) on its efficacy remains unclear.
objectiveTo compare the effectiveness and safety of EVT with or without prior IVT in treating AIS-BAO patients within 4.5 hours after stroke onset. METHODS AND
designA multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label controlled clinical trial with blinded assessment of endpoints. 340 patients will be consecutively randomised to receive IVT plus EVT or direct EVT in a ratio of 1:1 from about 100 hospitals in China. An interim analysis is planned when one-third (114) of the patients have completed the primary endpoint follow-ups. It anticipates that IVT plus EVT demonstrates superiority over direct EVT. If the superiority of IVT plus EVT over direct EVT is less than expected, the sample size may be expanded by up to 20% of the original size. If the efficacy of the two groups is similar, it will shift to a non-inferiority hypothesis, aiming to evaluate whether direct EVT is non-inferior to IVT plus EVT. OUTCOME: The primary endpoint is the proportion of independent neurological function defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 at 90±14 days after stroke onset. DISCUSSION: This trial is expected to provide novel evidence of the superiority or non-inferiority between EVT with or without IVT in the treatment of patients with AIS-BAO.
trial registrationNCT05631847 at ClinicalTrials.gov and ChiCTR2300070584 at Chictr.org.cn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.