ArticleBMJ open2025
Association between informal help and background factors for persons with multiple sclerosis in Sweden: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePersons living with multiple sclerosis (MS) may experience various symptoms, and some of these persons may need help in daily life. Previous research shows that informal-that is, unpaid-help is more common among persons with MS than formal help. This study aimed to explore the association between socio-demographic background factors and the use of informal help among persons with MS in Sweden, and to investigate any differences in the amount of informal help used per week. DESIGN AND
settingCross-sectional survey data combined with Swedish register data.
participants4412 persons with MS between the ages of 20 and 51 years responded to the survey. OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Use of informal help and (2) the number of hours of informal help used per week. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression and linear regression were used for analysis.
resultsIt was found that several socio-demographic background variables were associated with the use of informal help, but a higher degree of impairment, indicated by the Expanded Disability Status Scale for Multiple Sclerosis, had the strongest positive association (OR 6.94, 95% CI 4.70 to 10.03). Fewer variables were associated with the number of hours of informal help per week. The birth country had the strongest positive relationship (B 0.50, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.76) while whether one was living alone had the strongest adverse relationship (B -0.65, 95% CI -0.89 to -0.42). Three of the socio-demographic background variables were found to be positively associated with both the use of informal help and the number of hours of informal help used per week, birth country (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.79; B 0.50, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.76), receipt of sickness benefit (OR 4.22, 95% CI 3.19 to 5.58; B 0.25, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.44) and higher degree of impairment (OR 6.94, 95% CI 4.70 to 10.03; B 0.31, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.60). Persons with MS born outside the Nordic countries, receiving sickness benefit and severely affected by impairment more often used informal help and they used more hours of informal help per week.
conclusionsThe degree of impairment was the most important factor in determining whether informal help was used. However, the importance of the birth country and receipt of sickness benefit may indicate that subgroups of persons with MS are more vulnerable and referred to informal help rather than formal help.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.