Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40953860›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Factors influencing HPV vaccine acceptance in immunosuppressed patient populations: a protocol for a systematic review.

Lygia Maria Costa Soares, Ariane Vieira Carvalho, Caroliny Hellen Azevedo da Silva, Gabriela Moura Maximo, Kleyton Santos de Medeiros, Dyego Leandro Bezerra de Souza, Angelica Nogueira-Rodrigues, Ana Elza Oliveira de Mendonça

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lygia Maria Costa SoaresPostgraduate Program in Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil lygiaonco@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7614-0234
Ariane Vieira CarvalhoSanta Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Caroliny Hellen Azevedo da SilvaDepartment of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Gabriela Moura MaximoDepartment of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Kleyton Santos de MedeirosInstitute of Teaching, Research, and Innovation, League Against Cancer, Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4105-7535
Dyego Leandro Bezerra de SouzaDepartment of Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Angelica Nogueira-RodriguesEVA - Grupo Brasileiro de Tumores Ginecológicos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Elza Oliveira de MendonçaDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe development of effective vaccines targeting human papillomavirus (HPV) has significantly contributed to disease prevention, highly relevant in immunosuppressed patients who have higher incidence of HPV-related cancers than their non-immunosuppressed counterparts. However, the acceptance and uptake of the HPV vaccine among immunosuppressed individuals pose unique challenges. Immunocompromised patients' acceptance of the HPV vaccine is influenced by multifaceted factors, including concerns about safety and effectiveness, interactions with immunosuppressive medications and uncertainties due to their compromised immunity. This systematic review aims to identify the main factors influencing HPV vaccine acceptance among immunosuppressed patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A comprehensive search strategy will be executed across databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Cochrane Database. The review will encompass the three WHO-endorsed HPV vaccines (quadrivalent, bivalent and nonavalent) and will consider studies related to HPV vaccines and their administration. The scope includes study focusing on immunosuppressed patients who received organ transplants, cancer treatments or are HIV-positive. No temporal restrictions will be applied, and searches will be conducted until December 2025. Observational studies, including retrospective/prospective cohorts, case-control and cross-sectional studies, reporting factors influencing HPV vaccination in immunosuppressed populations will be included. Studies with overlapping patient populations will be excluded. Data extraction will include study details, demographics, vaccine type, risk/protective factors, outcomes and medical history. Validation and cross-verification will ensure data accuracy. Risk of bias will be assessed using ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions), and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) will rate evidence certainty. Meta-analysis, guided by Cochrane and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, will employ fixed/random-effects models, assessing heterogeneity using I² statistics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This research will analyse previously published data, so ethical approval is not required. The results of the systematic review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023452537.

Indexed as

Immunocompromised HostPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPatient Acceptance of Health CareHumansResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicPapillomavirus VaccinesHIV & AIDSHPV VaccineInfectious disease/HIV

Identifiers

PMID40953860
PMCPMC12434740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.