ArticleBMJ global health2025
The upstream-downstream tension in the global health classroom.
Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this practice paper, we reflect on our practices, experiences and observations of teaching global and public health, with a focus on navigating the upstream-downstream tension. The concept of upstream determination of health encompasses how the social, structural and systemic drivers shape health and well-being. This paper discusses the challenges of foregrounding this concept in pedagogy through four key themes: (1) a lack of uniformity in integrating upstream concepts across disciplines related to health, and the ways in which it could be better integrated specifically into global health curricula; (2) helping students navigate the upstream-downstream tension by reflecting on why downstream solutions are more prevalent and how to better understand the structural responses, which are needed for achieving health equity; (3) why upstream thinking is hard to teach and learn, given that upstream determination can be complex, less familiar and abstract (we outline conceptual barriers and pedagogical challenges, common missteps and potential strategies to overcome them); (4) looking upstream in global health roles; how future graduates may consider ways to work upstream in their role as global health professionals, given that many job opportunities tend to focus downstream. This paper highlights the challenges of teaching upstream determination in global health, with a call to more uniformly integrate its concepts into curricula and offers potential strategies for teachers to meaningfully and collectively foreground such concepts within pedagogical delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.