ArticleEcology2025
Multivariate signals of population collapse in a high-throughput ecological experiment.
Article in Ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anticipating population declines is a crucial goal of conservation ecology. Recent conceptual work suggests that populations facing growing stressors should exhibit sequential shifts in behavior, morphology, and abundance before declining to extinction. However, the lack of high-resolution, multidimensional data has hindered empirical validation of this conceptual work. Using an autonomously monitored, high-throughput experimental system, we generated individual-based data on populations of the ciliate Paramecium caudatum forced to collapse due to increasingly stressful conditions. The gradual introduction of a pollutant elicited the predictable sequence of responses-declines in movement speed, followed by declines in body length, emergence of early warning signals of collapse, and finally, abundance declines. Conversely, a press disturbance generated by the introduction of predators did not induce this sequence. The time between the first detectable trait changes and population collapse depended on the statistical approach used, but the sequence remained consistent. Using general additive models, detectable behavioral signals in the polluted populations occurred one generation before abundance-based early warning signals were detectable, and two generations before abundance decline. We highlight that multivariate monitoring, particularly individual-based metrics, is crucial for forecasting population declines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.