Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40953734›Full record

Trial reportTransplantation and cellular therapy2026

Pre-Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Ruxolitinib in Transplantation-Eligible Patients with Myelofibrosis: Long-Term Outcomes of a Phase II Prospective Study.

Rachel B Salit, Xinyi Fan, Ted A Gooley, Anna B Halpern, Nellie Ratsamee, Anise Marshall, Bart L Scott, H Joachim Deeg

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachel B SalitFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington; Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: rsalit@fredhutch.org.
Xinyi FanFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Ted A GooleyFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington; Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Anna B HalpernFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington; Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Nellie RatsameeFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Anise MarshallFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Bart L ScottFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington; Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
H Joachim DeegFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington; Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Eric Collisson · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL138826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ruxolitinib (Rux), the first FDA-approved JAK inhibitor for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF), was initially studied in patients who were ineligible for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, the resultant decrease in splenomegaly and improvement in symptoms allowed some of the study patients to become HCT-eligible. We aimed to determine whether giving Rux to HCT-eligible MF patients would yield favorable HCT outcomes in relation to a historical cohort at our center. We conducted this single-arm Phase II prospective single-center study of Rux followed by HCT in adult patients with primary and secondary MF between 2014 and 2020. Patients were not required to have symptoms or splenomegaly. Patients took Rux for at least 8 weeks (no maximum) prior to the start of conditioning and tapered off by day -4 of HCT conditioning. A total of 101 patients were enrolled in the study (median age, 57 years; range, 34 to 71 years), of whom 61 (60%) proceeded to HCT (59% primary MF, 70% DIPSS [dynamic international prognostic scoring system] intermediate-2 or high-risk) after a median of 7 months (range, 2 to 89 months) on Rux. Patients engrafted at a median of 20 days; there was 1 primary graft failure. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 13% at 1 year, compared to 26% in our historical cohort. With a median follow-up of 5.6 years among survivors, overall survival was 79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69% to 90%) at 2 years, compared to 67% in our historical cohort, and 5-year survival was 74% (95% CI, 64% to 86%). The hazard ratio of death for those who had a Rux response relative to those who did not was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.20 to 1.61; P = .29). In this prospective Phase II study, patients receiving pre-HCT Rux had encouraging NRM and survival rates relative to historical patients at our center who proceeded to HCT without prior Rux.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationPrimary MyelofibrosisPyrazolesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNitrilesProspective StudiesPyrimidinesTransplantation ConditioningTreatment OutcomeNitrilesPyrazolesPyrimidinesruxolitinib

Identifiers

PMID40953734
PMCPMC13336669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.