Trial reportTransplantation and cellular therapy2026
Pre-Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Ruxolitinib in Transplantation-Eligible Patients with Myelofibrosis: Long-Term Outcomes of a Phase II Prospective Study.
Trial report in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pre-transplant JAK-inhibition improves post-transplant outcome in myelofibrosis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ruxolitinib (Rux), the first FDA-approved JAK inhibitor for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF), was initially studied in patients who were ineligible for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, the resultant decrease in splenomegaly and improvement in symptoms allowed some of the study patients to become HCT-eligible. We aimed to determine whether giving Rux to HCT-eligible MF patients would yield favorable HCT outcomes in relation to a historical cohort at our center. We conducted this single-arm Phase II prospective single-center study of Rux followed by HCT in adult patients with primary and secondary MF between 2014 and 2020. Patients were not required to have symptoms or splenomegaly. Patients took Rux for at least 8 weeks (no maximum) prior to the start of conditioning and tapered off by day -4 of HCT conditioning. A total of 101 patients were enrolled in the study (median age, 57 years; range, 34 to 71 years), of whom 61 (60%) proceeded to HCT (59% primary MF, 70% DIPSS [dynamic international prognostic scoring system] intermediate-2 or high-risk) after a median of 7 months (range, 2 to 89 months) on Rux. Patients engrafted at a median of 20 days; there was 1 primary graft failure. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 13% at 1 year, compared to 26% in our historical cohort. With a median follow-up of 5.6 years among survivors, overall survival was 79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69% to 90%) at 2 years, compared to 67% in our historical cohort, and 5-year survival was 74% (95% CI, 64% to 86%). The hazard ratio of death for those who had a Rux response relative to those who did not was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.20 to 1.61; P = .29). In this prospective Phase II study, patients receiving pre-HCT Rux had encouraging NRM and survival rates relative to historical patients at our center who proceeded to HCT without prior Rux.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.