Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40953587›Full record

Trial reportEndoscopy2026

Prospective clinical validation of a novel artificial intelligence system for real-time detection of solid pancreatic masses during endoscopic ultrasonography.

Ji Young Bang, Adrian Săftoiu, Anca Udriștoiu, Lucian Gruionu, Elena Codruţa Gheorghe, Gabriel Gruionu, Jayapal Ramesh, Charles Melbern Wilcox, Shyam Varadarajulu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation StudyComparative StudyClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07381192 (An Artificial Intelligence System for Multimodal, Multi-class Diagnosing Solid Pancreatic Lesions Based on Endoscopic Ultrasound), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07381192 recruitingnot on this map

An Artificial Intelligence System for Multimodal, Multi-class Diagnosing Solid Pancreatic Lesions Based on Endoscopic Ultrasound

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorQilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityRan2025 to 2028Enrolled383ConditionsEndoscopic Ultrasound (EUS), Solid Pancreatic LesionArmsiEUS-SPL(intelligent endoscopic ultrasound system-pancreatic solid lesion)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ji Young BangDigestive Health Institute, Orlando Health, Orlando, United States.
Adrian SăftoiuMedical Softverse SRL, Craiova, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7993-8269
Anca UdriștoiuFaculty of Automation, Computers and Electronics, University of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Lucian GruionuFaculty of Mechanics, University of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Elena Codruţa GheorgheFaculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Gabriel GruionuKrannert Cardiovascular Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States.
Jayapal RameshDigestive Health Institute, Orlando Health, Orlando, United States.
Charles Melbern WilcoxDigestive Health Institute, Orlando Health, Orlando, United States.
Shyam VaradarajuluDigestive Health Institute, Orlando Health, Orlando, United States.

Funding

Orlando Health Department for Strategy and Innovations 24.015.01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the most sensitive modality for accurately establishing a tissue diagnosis in patients with solid pancreatic masses. However, small lesions can be challenging to detect, particularly for less experienced endosonographers. Therefore, outcomes of EUS are operator dependent. We validated the performance of novel artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced EUS for detection of solid pancreatic lesions. Methods: In this single-center, prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study, high-risk patients aged ≥18 years referred for pancreatic cancer screening or with suspected (solid and cystic) pancreatic lesions owing to symptoms, radiological, or laboratory findings were evaluated in real time using AI-EUS software. The model included 32 713 EUS frames (training/testing phases) of normal, solid, and >10-mm cystic pancreatic lesions from 202 patients. Clinical validation was conducted prospectively when EUS findings were evaluated concurrently in real time by two independent expert examiners, one using conventional EUS and another with AI-EUS, both blinded to the alternative assessments. The primary outcome was detection of solid pancreatic masses. Results: 308 patients were evaluated (January–July 2024). AI-EUS performance was not significantly different to that of conventional EUS performed by experts (97.1% vs. 100%; risk difference 2.9%, 95%CI –1.2 to 6.8; P = 0.25). Final pathology of 105 pancreatic solid masses revealed neoplasia in 93 (88.6%) and benign lesions in 12 (11.4%). Conclusion: The performance of AI-EUS was not significantly different to that of experienced endosonographers for detection and segmentation of solid pancreatic masses. By standardizing performance, AI-EUS may have the potential to optimize clinical outcomes in pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEndosonographyPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreasProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40953587
PMCPMC12923297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.