SynthesisThe Journal of school health2026
A Systematic Review of Secondary Traumatic Stress in School Personnel: A Synthesis of Quantitative Findings.
Synthesis in The Journal of school health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Secondary Traumatic Stress in School Personnel: A Synthesis of Quantitative Findings.The Journal of school health · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSecondary traumatic stress (STS) in school personnel is under-researched, with limited data on its frequency and susceptibility. This systematic review examines the extent of STS and the factors contributing to it among school personnel, defined as individuals employed or contracted by US school systems.
methodsThe review includes only studies that utilized the Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL) and/or the STS Scale (STSS). A comprehensive search identified 18 peer-reviewed publications (2012-2021).
findingsThirteen authors used the ProQOL, while six used the STSS, with half of the latter reporting moderate or higher STS levels. Studies using ProQOL scoring methods found average STS levels. Limitations include a lack of sample diversity, as most participants were white (32.4%-97.2%), female (70.9%-93.2%), and teachers (12/18 studies). Many variables had inconsistent findings across studies. Other variables such as leadership practices and school safety showed significant associations with STS. IMPLICATIONS: These data can be used to better understand factors associated with STS and to inform the development of effective preventative and reactive strategies to reduce the impact of STS on school personnel.
conclusionContinued research needs to occur assessing STS in school personnel to better inform best practices for prevention and reactive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.