ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2025
Magnetization transfer MRI (MT-MRI) detects white matter damage beyond the primary site of compression in degenerative cervical myelopathy using a novel semi-automated analysis.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the leading cause of spinal cord disorder in adults, yet conventional MRI cannot detect microstructural damage beyond the compression site. Current application of magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), while promising, suffer from limited standardization, operator dependence, and unclear added value over traditional metrics such as cross-sectional area (CSA). To address these limitations, we utilized our semi-automated analysis pipeline built on the Spinal Cord Toolbox (SCT) platform to automate MTR extraction. Our method integrates deep learning-based convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for spinal cord segmentation, vertebral labeling via the global curve optimization algorithm and PAM50 template registration to enable automated MTR extraction. Using the Generic Spine Protocol, we acquired 3T T2w- and MT-MRI images from 30 patients with DCM and 15 age-matched healthy controls (HC). We computed MTR and CSA at the maximal compression level (C5-C6) and a distant, uncompressed region (C2-C3). We extracted regional and tract-specific MTR using probabilistic maps in template space. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed with ROC analysis, and k-means clustering reveal patients subgroups based on neurological impairments. Correlation analysis assessed associations between MTR measures and DCM deficits. Patients with DCM showed significant MTR reductions in both compressed and uncompressed regions (p < 0.05). At C2-C3, MTR outperformed CSA (AUC 0.74 vs 0.69) in detecting spinal cord pathology. Tract-specific MTR were correlated with dexterity, grip strength, and balance deficits. Our reproducible, computationally robust pipeline links microstructural injury to clinical outcomes in DCM and provides a scalable framework for multi-site quantitative MRI analysis of the spinal cord.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.