Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40953533›Full record

ArticleSurgery2025

Drowning in the silver tsunami: Geriatric patient proportion impact on trauma outcomes.

Sebastian Boland, Liling Lu, Tamara Byrd, David Silver, Joshua B Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sebastian BolandDivision of Trauma and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Liling LuDivision of Trauma and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Pittsburgh Trauma and Transfusion Medicine Research Center, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.
Tamara ByrdDivision of Trauma and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
David SilverDivision of Trauma and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Joshua B BrownDivision of Trauma and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Pittsburgh Trauma and Transfusion Medicine Research Center, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: brownjb@upmc.edu.

Funding

TRAINING IN TRAUMA AND SEPSIS RESEARCHT32GM008516 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TIMOTHY R BILLIAR · 1994 to 2026
$9.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe volume-outcome relationship in trauma centers is well established, including geriatric volume. With an increasing geriatric population, it remains unclear whether a tipping point exists for these complex patients who overwhelm centers. Our objective was to evaluate whether the proportion of geriatric patients relative to total volume impacts outcomes.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed patients aged >15 years from the Trauma Quality Program Patient Use File dataset between the years 2017 and 2021. We calculated the center-level annual geriatric proportion of total adult patient volume. Generalized additive mixed models evaluated nonlinear effects between geriatric proportion and mortality for geriatric and nongeriatric patients adjusted for demographics, vitals, injury characteristics, center characteristics, frailty, and comorbidities.

resultsWe included 3,989,267 patients from 605 centers. Increasing geriatric proportion was associated with improving mortality for geriatric patients until reaching thresholds of 65% of total volume, where mortality plateaued. Importantly, at a geriatric proportion of 61%, mortality for nongeriatric adults began to increase (adjusted odds ratio per 5% increase: 1.04; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.08). Geriatric Charlson Comorbidity Index was related to nongeriatric mortality in the highest quartile of geriatric proportion (adjusted odds ratio: 1.18, 95% confidence interval: 1.11-1.25).

conclusionCenter-level geriatric proportion is an important predictor of both geriatric and nongeriatric trauma outcomes. At higher proportions of geriatric patients, the loss of the volume-outcome benefit and even increase in mortality suggests the medically complex geriatric population may overwhelm centers, leading to worse outcomes among all patients. These findings may inform trauma system planning to optimize care of our geriatric and nongeriatric patients.

Indexed as

Trauma CentersTsunamisWounds and InjuriesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40953533
PMCPMC13235967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.