ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025
Metal artifact reduction leading to appearance of fractures in pedicle screws: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetallic implants can cause imaging artifacts on CT and MRI. Although metal artifact reduction (MAR) techniques have enhanced imaging clarity, they can also lead to distortions that may resemble complications such as hardware fractures. The false appearance of fractured hardware, or "pseudofractures," can distort imaging interpretation and result in unnecessary revision surgery. OBSERVATIONS: A 65-year-old male sustained a T12-L1 fracture extending through the disc space with ligamentous interruption after a bicycle accident. The patient underwent T11-L2 posterior fusion with pedicle screws and was discharged in a thoracolumbar sacral orthosis brace after an uncomplicated postoperative course. Concerns about brace compliance prompted imaging, which demonstrated screw fractures and led to discussion of revision procedure. Repeat imaging revealed that these were artifacts, not hardware failure. No revision was needed and the patient continued to recover. LESSONS: This case emphasizes the importance of understanding imaging techniques that may impact interpretation and implications for surgical decision-making. Imaging artifacts should be considered when hardware fractures exist at multiple levels without suggestive history of new symptoms. Obtaining plain radiographs or images without MAR may assist in diagnostic uncertainty. Discussing MAR use with the radiology department at imaging acquisition may improve both imaging interpretations and resource utilization. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25358.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.