Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40953192›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025

Machine learning modeling for outcome prediction of hospitalized patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Mohamed Sobhi Jabal, Waseem Wahood, Jad Zreik, Cem Bilgin, Mohamed K Ibrahim, Muhammed Amir Essibayi, Hassan Kobeissi, Lorenzo Rinaldo, David F Kallmes, Giuseppe Lanzino and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mohamed Sobhi JabalDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Waseem WahoodCentral Michigan University College of Medicine, Mt Pleasant, MI, USA.
Jad ZreikDr Kiran C Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, FL, USA.
Cem BilginDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6243-9495
Mohamed K IbrahimDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Muhammed Amir EssibayiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8325-2382
Hassan KobeissiDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7446-624X
Lorenzo RinaldoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
David F KallmesDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8495-0040
Giuseppe LanzinoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Waleed BrinjikjiDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PurposeAneurysmal rupture and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) have an exceptionally high mortality and morbidity burden. The aim of this study was to develop interpretable machine learning models for predicting short-term poor outcomes defined by the National Inpatient Sample Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Outcome Measure (NIS-SOM).MethodsThe National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried from 2008 to 2018 to identify patients diagnosed with SAH who had undergone endovascular coiling or clipping for intracranial aneurysm. Demographic, comorbidity, risk factor, and hospital characteristic variables were recorded. Variables were preprocessed, and the feature space was reduced to include the most important features. To predict poor outcomes, machine learning models were trained and cross-validated before being evaluated on a separate testing set. Shapley Additive exPlanations of the best performing model was used for general and local model interpretation.ResultsAmong 18,149 admissions (mean age 55 ± 14 years, 68.8% women), 52.9% had a poor outcome. Test-set AUCs ranged 0.74-0.80; a multilayer perceptron performed best (AUC 0.80, precision 0.74, recall 0.82). SHAP ranked the ten most influential variables: age, neurological comorbidity, paralysis, Medicare insurance, smoking status, Elixhauser burden, fluid-electrolyte disorders, weight loss, arrhythmia, and heart failure.ConclusionsThe modeling predicted nationwide aSAH prognosis with decent accuracy and highlighted clinical, socioeconomic, and system-level drivers of determinants of poor short-term outcome. These results support the potential of explainable ML tools as complementary tools for early risk stratification, guiding resource allocation, and informing prospective multi-center validation and implementation studies.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecerebral aneurysmmachine learningprognosisSubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID40953192
PMCPMC12436348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.