ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025
Machine learning modeling for outcome prediction of hospitalized patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PurposeAneurysmal rupture and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) have an exceptionally high mortality and morbidity burden. The aim of this study was to develop interpretable machine learning models for predicting short-term poor outcomes defined by the National Inpatient Sample Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Outcome Measure (NIS-SOM).MethodsThe National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried from 2008 to 2018 to identify patients diagnosed with SAH who had undergone endovascular coiling or clipping for intracranial aneurysm. Demographic, comorbidity, risk factor, and hospital characteristic variables were recorded. Variables were preprocessed, and the feature space was reduced to include the most important features. To predict poor outcomes, machine learning models were trained and cross-validated before being evaluated on a separate testing set. Shapley Additive exPlanations of the best performing model was used for general and local model interpretation.ResultsAmong 18,149 admissions (mean age 55 ± 14 years, 68.8% women), 52.9% had a poor outcome. Test-set AUCs ranged 0.74-0.80; a multilayer perceptron performed best (AUC 0.80, precision 0.74, recall 0.82). SHAP ranked the ten most influential variables: age, neurological comorbidity, paralysis, Medicare insurance, smoking status, Elixhauser burden, fluid-electrolyte disorders, weight loss, arrhythmia, and heart failure.ConclusionsThe modeling predicted nationwide aSAH prognosis with decent accuracy and highlighted clinical, socioeconomic, and system-level drivers of determinants of poor short-term outcome. These results support the potential of explainable ML tools as complementary tools for early risk stratification, guiding resource allocation, and informing prospective multi-center validation and implementation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.