ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
Personalized pulse wave propagation modeling to improve vasopressor dosing management in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates whether examining the shape of arterial pulse waves and fitting to them a physiology-based mathematical model of pulse wave propagation can provide additional insights into the state of the cardiovascular system in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI), potentially enhancing vasopressor dosing strategies. We conducted a longitudinal study on 25 sTBI patients in an intensive care unit. Arterial pulse waves were recorded non-invasively from wrists and ankles using an oscillometric method and were used to inform a 0-1D model of the arterial blood flow dynamics. Model-estimated, patient-specific cardiovascular parameters were then used in a statistical model to predict changes in the administered dose of vasopressor (norepinephrine) in the next 24 hours. The model fits to the recorded pulse waves were satisfactory, with the coefficients of determination ([Formula: see text]) of approximately 0.9 and the differences between the measured and model-estimated mean arterial pressure of 0.1 ± 1.0 mmHg ([Formula: see text]=0.99). Except for a few patients, we found no clear association between the model-estimated parameters and norepinephrine dose at the time of pulse wave recording. Nevertheless, our predictive model achieved a balanced accuracy of 0.85 when trained and tested on the entire dataset and 0.76 when using the leave-one-out cross-validation, with 8 misclassifications among the total of 77 observations. Thus, despite the known inter-patient variability of hemodynamic response to vasopressors, the proposed method allowed predicting the direction of norepinephrine dose changes in the next 24 hours with satisfactory accuracy. Subject to further studies and extensive validation, our approach could inform a decision-support tool for optimizing vasopressor dosing on a per-patient basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.