ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2025
Effect of simple motor exercise on motor adaptation in complex dynamic tasks: exploring age-related variations.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dexterous manual actions rely on the integration of precise sensorimotor control and adaptive learning. However, it remains unclear how repetition of simple motor tasks influences subsequent adaptation to force perturbations in a dynamic manipulation task. This study examined whether different types of motor repetition, force-based or movement-based, affect the adaptation process in young and older adults. Sixty right-handed participants (30 young and 30 older) performed a dynamic manipulation task using a robotic interface, where they had to counteract perturbation torques during a handle-lifting movement. Before the perturbation trials, participants engaged in either force repetition, which required producing discrete isometric torque pulses, or movement repetition, which involved continuous wrist rotations. We found that young adults who performed force repetition exhibited enhanced adaptation in the dominant hand, whereas movement repetition did not yield the same benefit. However, older adults showed no significant modulation of adaptation based on repetition type. In addition, across all participants, adaptation performance differed between supination and pronation directions, with greater accuracy observed in the supination condition. This asymmetry was more pronounced in young adults and in the nondominant hand. These findings suggest that the benefits of force repetition for predictive motor control may depend on both age and limb dominance, with implications for motor training and rehabilitation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.