Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40953104›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Chikungunya virus in Thailand (2020-2023): Epidemiology, clinical features, and genomic insights.

Sarawut Khongwichit, Watchaporn Chuchaona, Sumeth Korkong, Lakkhana Wongsrisang, Thanunrat Thongmee, Yong Poovorawan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarawut KhongwichitCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Watchaporn ChuchaonaCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sumeth KorkongCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Lakkhana WongsrisangCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thanunrat ThongmeeCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Yong PoovorawanCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2337-6807

Funding

Center of Excellence in Clinical VirologyChulalongkorn UniversityHospital. S. Khongwichit
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) caused significant outbreaks in Thailand during 2008-2009 and 2018-2020. Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, CHIKV continued to circulate; however, data on its epidemiological, clinical, and genetic characteristics during and after this period remains limited. This study investigated CHIKV infections in Thailand from March 2020 to December 2023. Serum samples (n = 1,264) were collected from patients with suspected CHIKV infection at 14 hospitals across five provinces in central, eastern, and northeastern Thailand. Samples were tested by RT-qPCR and IgM fluorescence immunoassay. CHIKV infection was confirmed in 50.5% (638/1,264) of cases. Infections occurred across all age groups, with the highest prevalence among individuals aged ≥56 years. Clinical symptoms significantly associated with infection included myalgia, arthralgia, rash, and conjunctivitis. Rash was more frequently in individuals aged ≤15 years and was significantly associated with lower viral loads. Arthralgia was more common among older adults and was linked to later illness onset. Myalgia was least frequently reported in younger patients. Thirty-eight complete coding sequences of our Thai CHIKV strains were analyzed in phylogenetic and time-scaled trees alongside 186 global strains and 109 ECSA-IOL strains from GenBank, respectively. Genome analysis revealed that CHIKV strains circulating in Thailand during 2020-2023 belonged to the East/Central/South African-Indian Ocean lineage (ECSA-IOL). These strains did not evolve from earlier ECSA-IOL variants that carried the E1-A226V mutation, which was previously detected in Thailand. Instead, all isolates carried E1-K211E and E2-V264A, along with E1-226A, likely introduced from the Indian subcontinent around 2016-2017. This introduction triggered a major outbreak between late 2018 and 2020, followed by sustained transmission. The 2020-2023 Thai strains exhibited high genetic similarity to those from neighboring countries, with multiple nonsynonymous mutations suggesting ongoing viral adaptation. Understanding CHIKV epidemiology, clinical features, and evolution supports improved surveillance, diagnostics, and public health interventions.

Indexed as

Chikungunya FeverChikungunya virusAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGenome, ViralHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedPhylogenyThailand

Identifiers

PMID40953104
PMCPMC12449006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.